What is the Alien Agenda?
Special Guest Column By Ryan Wood
Broomfield, CO, Feb 16, 2026 -- For decades, researchers have asked the same question: Is there an “Alien Agenda”?
The honest answer from the historical record is more nuanced—and more intriguing—than simple invasion myths.
Across government documents, insider claims, and long-term witness reports, no single unified agenda emerges. Instead, the material points to multiple nonhuman groups, possibly with different goals, and hints at long-term presence, infrastructure, and even tacit accommodation by human authorities.
As one analysis puts it plainly: “There may be different groups and agendas… with some amount of collusion going on among these various alien groups.”
The Most Defensible “Top Five” Groups (from the record)
Based on the massive ufodex.com material, researcher Richard Dolan offers the clearest taxonomy currently available:
Ancient / Advanced Human-Appearing Group
Often described as human in form, reported across centuries. Their behavior is consistently characterized as non-hostile and observational:
“The approach seems to have been standoffish monitoring of human activity.”
Some accounts speculate on early genetic intervention in human evolution—but this remains hypothesis, not proof.
Mantid / Gray Group
Strongly associated with abduction and hybridization narratives. One of the clearest agenda indicators in the literature states:
“The abduction phenomenon and the apparent attempts to create a hybrid species tell us that at least some nonhuman intelligences have an agenda related to this planet.”
Motive—benign or otherwise—remains unresolved.
Reptilian Group
Identified in multiple insider and intelligence-linked summaries as part of a multi-party, long-term presence. Often framed not as conquerors, but as one faction among several competing civilizations engaged in study, territorial preference, or influence.
EBENs / Short Humanoid Group
Closely associated with “gray” entities in insider testimony. Described as part of a three-way competitive dynamic, with claims of underground or mountain-based habitation. Agenda details are broad and controversial, including DNA manipulation and long-term planetary involvement.
Additional, Unspecified Groups
An explicit admission that the taxonomy is incomplete. The record itself acknowledges:
“There may be different groups and agendas.”
This category exists precisely because the data does not yet allow firm conclusions.
What the Record Does Not Support
Importantly, several researchers explicitly rule out simplistic conclusions:
No evidence of open invasion
No clear evidence of covert conquest
No single, unified “alien master plan”
Instead, the data suggests long timelines, staged contact, competing interests, and careful non-disclosure—possibly enabled by secrecy at the highest human levels.
The Takeaway
If there is an “alien agenda,” the record supports only this much with confidence:
It is plural, not singular
It appears long-running and structured
It is not overtly hostile
And it remains incompletely understood
Anything beyond that crosses from evidence into speculation.
Key References Used
Alien Agendas
The End of the Upside Down Contact
Hidden Agenda
Journal of Alternative Realities (JAR)
Ask your own nuanced question of UFOdex.com...dive in give it a tough one.
###
CONTACT:
Ryan Wood/Wood Enterprises
14004 Quail Ridge Drive | Broomfield, CO 80020 US
