MUFON Case: Grey Alien 2021 Abduction Experience
By Matthew Kellison
State Director, Florida MUFON
MUFON Case No. 142206: Summary of Investigative Video Analysis
This report summarizes the investigative and forensic analysis of a video recording associated with MUFON Case No. 142206. The video was discovered by the witness in December 2021 while reviewing media files stored on his Samsung Galaxy S21 cellphone. The witness reported having no conscious recollection of recording the footage, however he was able to recall portions of the event through several hypnotherapy sessions with Yvonne Smith and Dr. Thomas Beck.
Metadata embedded within the file indicates the video was recorded on June 12, 2021 at 01:15 a.m. Eastern Daylight Time. The recording is approximately 42 seconds in duration and consists of roughly 1,271 discrete frames captured at an effective frame rate of approximately 29.9 frames per second in a square 1:1 recording format.
According to the witness’s account, the event occurred shortly after he returned home and parked his vehicle near his residence in the Key West, Florida. As he walked along a pathway toward the entrance of his townhome, he observed a humanoid figure consistent with the archetypal “Grey” entity commonly reported in UFO encounter cases. The witness stated that the entity stood motionless at the end of the walkway.
He then experienced sudden paralysis and reported the sensation of being levitated slightly above the ground before being guided toward a large, glowing spherical object positioned on the nearby golf course fairway. The object reportedly emitted a bright orange illumination and appeared to allow entry through an opening located on the underside of the craft via a ramp or hatch.
The witness recalled entering the craft and moving through a curved interior corridor leading toward a brightly illuminated room that resembled a medical or examination area. After passing through this area, he was escorted into a darker control room where the video recording appears to have been captured. Within this compartment, the witness described observing multiple non-human entities. These included several Grey-type beings, two frog-like humanoids wearing dark clothing, and a reptilian humanoid approximately five feet in height with cranial characteristics resembling those of a theropod dinosaur and dressed in a light-colored tunic.
The witness reported receiving telepathic communication during the encounter. One of the taller Grey entities appeared to occupy a supervisory or authoritative role and conveyed messages suggesting that the witness had a “job” or “mission.” The frog-like entities were perceived as being doctors or healers, with one projecting a calming or reassuring emotional presence. The reptilian figure was interpreted by the witness as having a scientific or observational role.
The recorded video depicts a dimly illuminated interior environment while simultaneously showing the blinking obstruction lights of a nearby cell tower visible through what appears to be a window. The tower was identified as a three-legged lattice communications structure located at approximately 1,163 feet south-southeast of the witness’s residence. The tower’s red lights flash simultaneously at two second intervals, consistent with Federal Aviation Administration regulations requiring obstruction beacons to flash 30 times per minute. These periodic flashes intermittently illuminate portions of the interior environment visible in the recording.
These two obstruction lights near the top of the tower are spaced approximately 10 feet apart and are mounted at a height 180 feet above ground level. By comparing the known spacing of these lights with their proportional separation in the video frame, and incorporating the camera field-of- view information contained within the phone’s metadata, the approximate distance between the camera and the tower lights was calculated to be approximately 130 feet. Given the tower’s distance from the residence and the height of the lights themselves, this geometric relationship suggests that the recording location was significantly elevated and in close proximity to the tower rather than at ground level near or inside the witness’s home.
Frame-by-frame analysis reveals several unusual structural features within the environment. Near the ceiling of the compartment is a circular ring-shaped light positioned above a disc-like structure. The outer edge of the disc appears to contain regularly spaced dark features that move across successive frames, suggesting rotational motion in a counter-clockwise direction. Numerous small particles or debris are visible drifting through the environment and occasionally reflect the red flashes produced by the tower lights.
One of the most notable features observed during analysis is a transient object that repeatedly traverses the upper portion of the frame. This object enters from the upper right and moves toward the left during several sequences throughout the recording. The frequency of these passes alternates irregularly between 11 and 16 frames. This alternating interval does not conform to the symmetrical spacing expected from conventional rotating mechanical devices such as ceiling fan blades.
In several frames, the object appears amorphous in form and may interact with a membrane-like surface above the ringed light structure. Several frames also appear to capture partial anatomical features of the entities described by the witness. Enlarged and contrast-enhanced frames reveal structures resembling the large cranial proportions and almond-shaped eyes commonly associated with Grey-type beings. Additional frames show shapes consistent with amphibian-like facial features corresponding to the frog-like entities and another that appears to show a reptilian entity with a dinosaur-like head. In some sequences, reflective eye structures are visible during the tower light flashes.
Additional interior structures become visible during brief illumination events caused by the tower’s flashing lights. A rectangular, console-like structure appears in the lower portion of the frame during one sequence and may represent an internal component within the compartment. Near the end of the recording, a bright vertical band of white light appears along the right side of the frame as the camera pans. The boundary between illuminated and dark areas is sharply defined, producing a lighting effect that appears to exhibit properties that cannot be explained by current models of optical physics.
Audio analysis of the recording identified several notable characteristics. During the early portion of the clip, the witness can be heard verbally reacting with expressions of shock. Throughout much of the recording, intermittent metallic rattling noises are present. Spectral analysis shows these sounds contain broadband energy typical of brief metallic contact events, although their specific origin remains undetermined with the available data.
A persistent low-frequency background hum is present throughout the recording with dominant spectral peaks near 59 Hz and associated harmonic frequencies. This pattern is consistent with electromagnetic interference produced by electrical infrastructure operating on the North American power grid. Given the proximity of the cell tower to the recording location, it is possible that electrical components associated with the tower may have produced electromagnetic interference captured by the phone’s microphone.
A brief speech-like vocalization was also detected within the audio when the recording was slowed and filtered. The signal exhibits harmonic characteristics consistent with human speech and contains a fundamental frequency near 93.75 Hz. While the phrase appears to contain two short words, the precise wording could not be conclusively determined. No infrasonic or ultrasonic signals outside the normal range of human hearing were detected during analysis.
Metadata examination of the original file indicates that the recording is internally consistent with a native video produced by an Android mobile device. Minor discrepancies in frame timing and duration are consistent with the variable frame rate encoding commonly used in smartphone video capture. No evidence of post-recording editing, recompression, or digital manipulation was identified within the file structure.
In summary, the video associated with MUFON Case No. 142206 contains multiple visual, structural, and acoustic anomalies documented through frame-by-frame analysis. Although certain elements remain ambiguous due to low illumination and image resolution, the forensic characteristics of the file are consistent with an authentic mobile-device recording. Additionally, the geometric analysis indicates the camera was positioned approximately 130 feet horizontally from the tower’s obstruction lights, while the visual perspective within the recording suggests the location as approximately the same vertical elevation as the lights, which are mounted at roughly 180 feet above ground level.
Continued analysis using advanced imaging, signal processing, and independent expert review is recommended and may provide additional insight into the structures and entities observed within the footage.
ABOUT MUFON:
If you see something or if you feel you have been abducted, you can report it to MUFON at:
https://mufoncms.com/public_report/
We will investigate your report. More importantly, we have an Experiencer Resource Team to help abductees cope with their experience.
MUFON is a 501c3 non-profit organization. We have been doing the Air Forces’ business since 1969 when Blue Book ended. We are a free, open, grassroots team of UFO Investigators staffed by dedicated volunteers only! We are not funded by billionaires. We are not affiliated with the U.S. or any other Government. Please consider joining us or donating to the cause at mufon.com!
###
CONTACT:
Matthew Kellison
State Director, Florida MUFON
Experiencer Resource Team Member
Email: mufonfimk@gmail.com
